Returning now to AFTER IMAGE, I have already mentioned the numerous follow-up projects carried out by Alexa and her scientific partner Alf Linney.
The latest, Conversation Piece, which received a Sci-Art Award in 2006, is described
by Alexa as an intelligent room that can hold conversations with its occupants.
Alexa explains: “In this interactive audio installation visitors will encounter up to three small sculptures displayed on plinths. People are tracked as they enter the space, and anyone passing close to one of the sculptures will be greeted by a disembodied voice which will then try to engage the visitor in conversation. Using keywords to interpret what is said in reply 'Heather', the disembodied voice, will conduct conversations with individuals at up to three different locations in the room.”
What is the scientific value of this work? Conversation Piece has brought together existing and emerging technologies for speech and hearing and introduced people
and ideas from various scientific disciplines to one another. The work is still in its development stage so it is too early to assess the extent of its benefits to science or,
for that matter, its significance.
So the question remains: can this type of Sci-Art follow-up activity be regarded,
in any way, as wealth generating? Probably not in the short term but, at a time when there are growing doubts about whether or not our educational system (which usually divides the arts from the sciences) can meet the needs of an emerging knowledge based economy, I believe Alexa’s example pinpoints the way ahead. We all stand to gain from an educational system in which scientists and artists are encouraged to enrich and maximise each other’s potential. For the future, to promote growth
and competitiveness, it will be vitally important that we give increased emphasis
to the under-recognised role of the arts in driving change and innovation.